Attempt to change DCCC rules fails, narrowly

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

On a party-line vote, majority tries to keep control; progressives narrowly block “banana republic” move

The battle for the future of the Democratic Party in San Francisco showed up in clear relief last night as the panel voted 18-11 not to radically change its bylaws – and the members allied with or appointed by Chair Mary Jung voted in lockstep for the changes.

It would have taken a two-thirds vote to change the rules just after the filing deadline, a move that would have altered the outcome of the June election and made it more likely that Jung, who is a lobbyist for the Association of Realtors, would retain control of the party…

That means the June election will select a new panel under the existing rules, and at some point after that, the new committee can discuss a wide range of bylaws changes, including campaign-finance reform, conflict-of-interest provisions, and a lot more…

Even opponents of the plan said that the bylaws need reform – there are no limits on conflicts of interest on the panel, and, for example, campaign consultants can vote on measures they are being paid to support or oppose.

There are no limits on campaign contributions…

And DCCC meetings are not recorded, much less streamed on the Internet, so it’s hard for many people to see what’s happening and keep track of what the elected members are doing.

But in this case, the rules would have been changed shortly after the filing deadline – so people who filed to run for office would be running under different rules than were in place when they signed the paperwork.

The party-line vote sent a clear message… (more)

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s