Category Archives: Parks and Rec

SF’s Flawed $438 Million Bond Proposal

By Randy Shaw : beyondchron – excerpt

Bond Fails to Prioritize COVID19 Priorities

Mayor Breed’s proposed $438 million “Health and Recovery Bond” raises serious questions about city priorities. Much if not most of the proposed spending does not meet COVID-19 needs. The Board of Supervisors must revise it before it gets to the ballot… (more)

If the bond doesn’t meet the COVID-19 needs of the city, the voters can always oppose it. There is no reason to encourage a waste of funds during an economic crisis. By November the crisis will be real if things do not improve soon.

SF parks should be part of homeless solution

: sfchronicle – excerpt

As longtime resident users of San Francisco parks, and directors of community programs that utilize Golden Gate Park and other parks in the city, we are in full support of the proposal to explore Safe Sleeping Sites on San Francisco Rec and Parks managed lands.

Supervisors Sandra Fewer and Gordon Mar have proposed legislation that would 1) make it allowable to use Rec and Parks land for “Safe Sleeping Sites” and 2) would require the Rec and Parks department to develop an inventory of sites that meet the requirements of such a site from the Department of Public Health. This legislation does not actually propose a site but rather opens up a conversation about how we all must come together to work on solutions to an incredible challenge made even more so challenging by a pandemic….

We thank Supervisors Fewer and Mar for putting forth this proposal to explore the use of Rec and Parks lands (which include parks as well as parking lots and other facilities) to help us together identify possible sites for safe sleeping. It is the right thing to do, and as people who are deeply invested in the park system, you have our strong support… (more)

 

Flying drones in San Francisco parks could result in a $200 fine, officials say

thedronegirl – excerpt

San Francisco doesn’t want you to fly drones in their city parks.

The seemingly tech-forward city has been the source of much confusion around whether or not it is legal to fly drones there. But a San Francisco Recreation and Park Department spokesperson confirmed to The Drone Girl that it is issuing citations of up to $192 for flying drones in city parks.

The Northern California city has among the nation’s best parks, including Golden Gate Park, Alamo Square Park (famous for being lined with the houses you see in Full House) and hipster enclave Mission Dolores Park, which offers stunning views of the downtown skyline. The city even ranks No. 3 in a poll by the Trust for Public Land, a national nonprofit that helps fund and protect parks, for best parks.

All that said, don’t fly drones there (without a commercial permit).

Numerous Drone Girl readers have written in, saying people are getting $125 tickets for flying drones citing the outdated City Municipal Park Code 3.09 and 7.04(a)(1). to back up the ban. Here’s the full text of those codes:.. (more)

Now we know. Flying drones in parks requires a commercial permit.

RELATED:
Ask Drone Girl: Where can I fly?

Peskin looks to dust off Willie Brown rule on city commissions

Former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown had a policy of kicking political candidates off city commissions the moment they entered a race.

Brown, now a Chronicle columnist, recoiled at the idea that anyone would run a campaign and hold a low-level government position at the same time. His successors, Gavin Newsom and Ed Lee, also made a practice of asking their appointees to leave once they pulled candidate’s papers.

But because the rule was never written down, it wasn’t really enforced — and eventually, candidates ignored the tradition.

As a result, several people who are currently running for office serve on commissions, and a debate is brewing in City Hall over whether they should be allowed to keep their seats. Supervisor Aaron Peskin, who wants to resurrect and cement Brown’s policy, will formally ask the city attorney to draft a measure… (more)

Westside San Franciscans are none too happy about new water mix

By Rachel Swan : sfchronicle – excerpt

Tap-Water.jpg

What is coming out of your water? For now, where you live and work will determine the answer. Photo by zrants

San Franciscans take pride in drinking pristine water from Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, which they treasure as among the purest in the nation.

So a recent move by the Public Utilities Commission to introduce ground water gradually into the city’s drinking supply prompted anxiety and suspicion.

“How will this affect my grandaughter? I feel like she’s the guinea pig,” said Ingrid Eggers, a Mission District resident who spoke at a Wednesday hearing before the Board of Supervisors’ Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee.

Eggers was among dozens of residents who had concerns about nitrates, pesticide runoff, sewage, artificial turf particulate and traces of pharmaceutical drugs possibly contaminating the blended water, which will go to about 60 percent of San Francisco residents, mostly on the west side.

City water officials began pumping the new mix in March from wells that draw from an acquifer about 400 feet below ground. They plan to add more ground water over the next four years, but it will allow for more than 15 percent of the mixture…

Supervisor Norman Yee, who called the hearing, asked the PUC to perform new quality tests and return with a new analysis… (more)

A lot of questions remain, especially for people with compromised immune systems and chemical sensitivities. You can’t fault people for drinking bottled water as that will be the preference for many, much to the dismay of the water expert, who was “was actually mildly shocked to hear that, ‘Oh my God, people will obviously turn to bottled water’.”

No doubt many will choose bottled water at a time when there is great concern about increasing bottles in our environment. The issues must be weighed and a balance found. Are we going to increase the use of pesticides into our drinking water and increase the number of bottles to recycles or can we return to clean pure Hetch Hetchy water coming out of the taps?

Rec and Park did not show up to explain their use of poisons on our parks that will end up in our water and neither did the health department official. They will be asked to come to the next hearing along with some answers and new data on the actual tests results since the blend was initiated, not based on questionable forecast data.

RELATED:

City Hall flooded with complaints over SF’s new mixed drinking waterCity Hall flooded with complaints over SF’s new mixed drinking water

by Joshua Sabatini : sfexaminer – excerpt

Yee vowed that the board’s Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee will hold a follow-up hearing…(more)

SF supervisors need to approve natural-areas program

Op-ed by Jared Blumenfeld : sfchronicle – excerpt

poison

Keep Monsanto Roundup out of our city. We don’t want poison seeping into the ground water we are drinking.

…San Francisco defines “natural areas” as what remains of our city’s primordial landscape. These lands include diverse native habitats and species, like the Mission blue butterfly and San Francisco garter snake, that are found nowhere else on Earth. Today, these wild places remain fragile; their single biggest threat is invasive weeds…

For larger-scale natural-areas projects, a plan was required. Unfortunately, there has been a near glacial delay between the completion of a forward-thinking management plan, back in 2006, and that plan being blessed by the Board of Supervisors. Fortunately, today that wait could be over.

If you care about protecting San Francisco’s wild side, you can make a difference by speaking up at the supervisors’ meeting for the plants and animals that don’t have a voice. Dog walkers, tree lovers and environmentalists will all articulate reasons they want the Natural Areas plan to go away. As someone who falls into all three camps, I understand their frustration: It’s been an exhaustingly long and acrimonious process… (more)

This is a misleading editorial in that there is no mention of the details of the plan, that is to kill off most of the “non-native” species that have lived here and adapted to the area for decades and replant the “original” species of “natural native” plants that have not survived. This is NOT about preserving what is here now.

RELATED:
Carcinogen Warning Label on Roundup Weed Killer Coming to California
California can require Monsanto to label its popular weed killer Roundup as a carcinogen, according to a ruling by a judge in Fresno, California, although the corporation maintains that the product is harmless… What is Roundup and what is the problem with its chief ingredient, glyphosphate?…Environmentalists, consumer protectionists, and straightforward victims of glyphosphate-caused cancers and related poisoning object to Roundup’s principle ingredient, the odorless and colorless glyphosate, which was patented by Monsanto then marketed as early as 1974 to kill weeds but leave crops (apparently) intact…Glyphosphate is not only in Roundup! Monsanto lost patent protection on glyphosate in 2000, and a large number of herbicides now use it as an active ingredient, including OrthoGroundclear, KleenUp, Aquamaster, Sharpshooter, StartUp, Touchdown, Total Traxion, Vector, and Vantage Plus Max II… (more)

We encourage you to read the rest of the article for further details.

Is this going to be a repeat of the Soccer Fields? Environmentalists and others warned that the material planned for use on the soccer fields and other city parks is toxic, and especially harmful to young children based on prior evidence. Soon after the city approved the use of the toxic material, the state legislature up a halt on use of the product. How many times are city officials going to ignore the voices of scientists and environmentalists, and allow the purchase and application of toxic substances into our environment? Can we not find a less toxic means of dealing with weeds and unwanted plants?

This s particularly alarming now that we are mixing ground water into our drinking water. Everything that goes into the ground will end up in our drinking water. It is more important than ever to protect the ground water. There must be other ways to manage our parks and open space that does not require the use of toxic substances. City Hall should order those methods be used.

 

 

Rally for Trees & Against Pesticides in Our Parks! Feb 28, 2017

Press Release by SF Forest Alliance

rally-and-hearing-feb-2017

Rally for Trees & Against Pesticides in Our Parks!

Join Our City and San Francisco Forest Alliance to demand that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors vote to reject the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that allows the Recreation and Park Department to cut down over 18,000 trees and spray toxic herbicides to ‘manage’ our public parks.

After the rally we will assemble in the City Hall Board of Supervisors chamber, room 250, to speak in favor of the appeal to block Rec & Park’s plan.

Rally
WHEN:       1:00 pm Tuesday February 28th
WHERE:     SF Civic Center Plaza (across from City Hall, Polk St. steps

Hearing
WHEN:       3:00 pm Tuesday February 28th
WHERE:     Board of Supervisors Chamber, SF City Hall, Room 250
(come early to get a seat)

Map – http://tinyurl.com/SFCityHall-Plaza-BART
Directions – http://sfgov.org/cityhall/directions-city-hall

More information: https://sfforest.org and https://sfforest.org/blog-updates/

See you at City Hall!
San Francisco Forest Alliance

Public opinion does make a difference! Thank you for your support
The San Francisco Forest Alliance is a non-profit 501(c)4 environmental organization working to protect urban forests, reduce pesticide use, and preserve access to our parks.

Update on Summer of Love Concert Appeal

February 14, 2017 03:55 PM Eastern Standard Time

SAN FRANCISCO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Summer of Love:

WHO50th Anniversary Summer of Love (SOL) free concert — organizers go before San Francisco Parks and Recreation Commission to appeal its denial of a permit to sponsor free music concerts in Golden Gate Park celebrating the 50th anniversary of San Francisco’s Summer of Love in 1967. Celebrity speakers will feature Country Joe McDonald and Barry Melton, founders of County Joe and the Fish, David Freiberg, famed bass guitarist of the Jefferson Starship, and comedian Will Durst.

WHAT – The denial is the first such setback for the event organizers in 40 years of sponsoring the Summer of Love commemorative concerts in Golden Gate Park. Summer of Love news conference precedes the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. SOL leaders seek to overturn the permit denial and obtain an event permit.

WHEN – Thursday, February 16, 2017. News conference begins 9:30 a.m. (PDT). Parks and Recreation Commission hearing begins 10 a.m.

WHERE – San Francisco City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room # 416 San Francisco, CA 94102

OTHER – Celebrities and SOL concert supporters are expected to attend the news conference and Parks and Recreation Commission appeal hearing.

Contacts

for Summer of Love
Boots Hughston, 415-871-9852
boots2b1@yahoo.com